The rise of anti-Israel sentiment in Europe isn’t just about the Middle East conflict; it’s a reflection of a deeper ideological divide. Many European progressives view Israel as a symbol of nationalism and strong borders, concepts they’ve been trying to reconsider within their own countries.
Israel’s assertion of its national identity and right to self-defense stands in contrast to the European Union’s push for open borders and shared sovereignty. This difference in values has led to an alliance between some European progressives and Islamist groups, united in their opposition to Israel.
The contrast is notable. While European nations navigate the challenges of immigration and cultural identity, Israel maintains a clear sense of who it is and what it stands for. This self-assurance challenges many European elites, as it differs from their vision of a borderless, multicultural society.
But here’s the key point: Israel’s success in maintaining its national character while thriving economically and technologically raises questions about the European progressive ideology. It’s an example that nation-states can be successful, innovative, and secure without sacrificing their identity or borders.
The progressive’s criticism of Israel isn’t just about foreign policy; it’s a challenge to the idea that a nation has the right to define and defend itself. This attitude has led to a lack of awareness of the threats facing both Israel and Europe, particularly from radical Islamism.
European traditionalists and conservatives find themselves in an unexpected alliance with Israel, recognizing that its struggle for survival and identity mirrors their own efforts to preserve European cultures and values. They see in Israel a model of how to resist the pressure to dissolve national identities in the name of globalism.
It’s time for Europe to reassess its stance on Israel. Supporting Israel isn’t just about Middle East politics; it’s about affirming the right of nations to exist, to have secure borders, and to maintain their unique identities. It’s a stand against the erosion of national sovereignty and the potential drawbacks of unchecked multiculturalism.
In the end, the progressive’s criticism of Israel reveals more about their own ideological challenges than it does about the Jewish state. As Europe grapples with the consequences of its open borders experiment, Israel’s example of national resilience becomes increasingly relevant. Maybe it’s time for European leaders to consider Israel’s approach and rediscover the value of national pride and secure borders.